Written by Founder, Amir Karam MD
There are certain signs of aging people tolerate fairly well. Upper lip lines usually aren’t one of them.
In fact, I’ve found these vertical lines — often called “smoker’s lines” — can bother patients more than much larger aging changes elsewhere on the face. Even after a beautiful facelift or skin rejuvenation procedure, persistent upper lip lines can leave someone feeling like the outcome is incomplete.
I’ve had many patients tell me these lines bother them more than their neck or jawline because they’re impossible to hide in motion, conversation, and expression.
And despite the nickname, these lines absolutely do not only happen to smokers.
They happen because of aging skin, repetitive muscle movement, collagen loss, thinning tissue, and time.
After treating this area for more than 20 years, I’ve also learned something else: Some of the most commonly performed treatments can actually make this problem harder to fix later.
So let’s walk through how these lines form, what actually works, and where I think people often go wrong.
The area between the nose and the red lip is called the “white lip.”
As we age:
The muscle surrounding the mouth — the orbicularis oris — contracts every time we purse our lips, drink from a straw, speak, or kiss.
When we’re young, the skin bounces back.
Over time, it stops bouncing back.
A dynamic line eventually becomes a static wrinkle.
At first, you only see the lines when pursing.
Later, they’re present even at rest.
That distinction matters because treatment changes dramatically depending on where you are on that continuum.
If someone is starting to notice upper lip creasing in their 30s or 40s, the best preventative treatment is usually a very small amount of Botox. And I want to emphasize very small.
Too much Botox around the mouth is miserable.
It can flatten the smile, weaken the lip, affect speech, and make simple things like drinking uncomfortable.
This is one of those areas where more is definitely not better.
My wife, Neda, naturally has strong muscle activity around the mouth, and for years we’ve conservatively used tiny amounts of Botox in this region simply to soften that repetitive contraction before the lines become permanently etched into the skin.
This works best when the lines are still mostly dynamic.
Once they become deeply static, Botox alone won’t solve the problem.
In very early static lines, a small amount of filler can sometimes help support the area.
But this is also one of the easiest places on the face to overdo.
One thing I learned years ago is that trying to aggressively fill each vertical line individually often backfires. The filler can spread around the wrinkle, creating waviness or fullness that actually makes the line look worse.
In mild cases, conservative structural support can help.
But repeatedly filling this area over years often creates an unnatural upper lip that becomes puffy, stiff, or uneven.
Unfortunately, this is one of the more difficult problems to reverse because filler over time can stimulate tissue changes and scar-like thickening that resurfacing procedures cannot fully correct.
This is why restraint matters so much here.
If I had to pick the single most reliable treatment for established upper lip lines, it would be resurfacing, without question.
The earlier you do it, the better the outcome tends to be.
Resurfacing works by removing layers of damaged skin down to the base of the wrinkle so the skin can heal smoother and tighter.
But there’s an important limitation:
You can only safely go so deep.
If a wrinkle has folded deeply into the skin over many years, there’s a point where you cannot completely erase it without risking scar formation.
That’s why timing matters so much.
Shallower wrinkles respond dramatically better than very deep ones.
My preferred laser for this area is the Sciton Contour TRL erbium YAG laser.
The reason is precision.
Unlike traditional CO2 lasers, erbium YAG creates less residual heat in the tissue, which allows more controlled resurfacing and generally faster healing.
That matters because one of the worst possible complications of aggressive upper lip resurfacing is permanent hypopigmentation — what people sometimes describe as a “white mustache.”
Years ago, this complication was more common with aggressive CO2 resurfacing and mechanical dermabrasion.
In over a decade using erbium YAG for this area, I personally have not encountered permanent hypopigmentation in my practice.
Another important point: I’m talking about full-field resurfacing here — not fractional lasers.
Fractional lasers absolutely have a role in skin rejuvenation.
But in my experience, they’re often not powerful enough to significantly improve moderate or severe vertical upper lip lines.
Treatments like:
can improve texture and skin quality, but deeply etched lip lines are often still there afterward.
That doesn’t make these treatments “bad.”
It just means expectations need to be realistic.
Interestingly, yes — indirectly.
A lip lift is not a primary treatment for upper lip lines, but shortening the white lip can sometimes soften wrinkling because the procedure effectively tightens and supports the skin in that region.
I don’t think this is a reason to do a lip lift.
But when someone is already a good candidate for one, it can be a nice secondary benefit.
One of the biggest misconceptions about upper lip lines is that they’re purely procedural.
They’re not.
The healthier and thicker the skin remains over time, the better it resists repetitive folding and wrinkling.
This is one of the reasons I’m so consistent about daily skin care:
Healthy skin simply ages better.
And while skin care won’t erase deeply etched lines, it absolutely helps delay and minimize them.
If you were sitting in my consultation chair, this is how I’d generally think about upper lip lines:
Early dynamic lines:
Early static lines:
Moderate to severe lines:
And perhaps most importantly: Avoid chronically overfilling this area. That’s probably the single most difficult complication to truly correct later.
After decades treating these lines, I’ve learned that success comes down to understanding timing, skin quality, muscle activity, and the biological limits of what skin can safely heal from.
That perspective only comes from years of seeing what works… and what unfortunately doesn’t.
What causes upper lip lines?
Upper lip lines form from repetitive muscle movement combined with collagen loss, thinning skin, aging, and sun damage.
Are smoker’s lines only caused by smoking?
No. Smoking can worsen them, but many non-smokers develop upper lip lines naturally with age.
What is the best treatment for upper lip lines?
It depends on severity. Early lines often respond well to conservative Botox, while deeper etched lines usually respond best to resurfacing.
Does filler help upper lip wrinkles?
Sometimes in mild cases, but overfilling this area often creates unnatural fullness and waviness.
What laser works best for smoker’s lines?
In my experience, erbium YAG resurfacing is one of the most reliable treatments because it allows precise depth control with less residual heat than traditional CO2 resurfacing.
Can skin care help prevent upper lip lines?
Absolutely. Retinoids, antioxidants, and daily sun protection help preserve collagen and keep skin more resilient over time.
17 comments
Kim Drinkwater
Will fibreblast help with lip lines
———
KaramMD Skin replied:
Hi Kim—Thanks for your question! Plasma fibroblast therapy can be a helpful option for minor softening of lip lines. That said, results vary greatly depending on the depth of your lines and your skin type, and the treatment does come with notable downtime (think small scabs and swelling for up to a week or two), so it’s worth having a thorough conversation with a board-certified dermatologist who can assess whether it’s the right fit for you or whether alternatives like retinoids or laser resurfacing might give you better results.
Sarah McShan
Thank you so much for your very informative articles. Does a chemical peel help with lip lines?
Sandra
Hi Dr karam,would skin needling help with lip lines?
Lisa-Marié
Thanks
Irene
I am a 50-year-old woman with a naturally slim build. My weight has remained very stable throughout my adult life, except during my pregnancies. Over the last few years, I have noticed that the skin on my upper abdomen (between the rib cage and the navel) has become thinner and developed a crepey, slightly wrinkled appearance that resembles cellulite or fine skin folds.
I have previously undergone treatments such as biostimulators and enzymes (started three or four years ago). The biostimulators initially seemed to improve the skin quality, although I later developed a small palpable nodule after a Sculptra treatment.
From your experience, what treatments have the strongest scientific evidence for improving skin thickness, firmness, and overall skin quality in this area? Are there any treatments that can genuinely stimulate collagen and elastin production and produce measurable improvement in mature skin, or are the results generally limited?
I would also appreciate your opinion on the effectiveness of biostimulators, radiofrequency devices, ultrasound-based treatments, lasers, topical products, or any newer therapies that you consider particularly promising for this type of skin concern.
In my country, Ecuador, treatments such as Morpheus8, Exilis, and Liftera are commonly used to improve skin laxity and skin quality.
Given the history I described above, do you believe any of these technologies would be appropriate for my particular situation? Are these treatments considered evidence-based in the United States for improving thin, crepey abdominal skin in women around my age?
If so, which of these technologies would you consider most effective for stimulating collagen production, improving skin thickness, and enhancing overall skin quality in the upper abdomen? Are there any other treatments available in the United States that you believe have stronger scientific support or provide better results for this specific concern?
Thank you very much for taking the time to read my message and for any guidance you may be able to provide.
Regards
Irene Trujillo
———
KaramMD Skin replied:
Hi Irene—Thank you for such a thoughtful and detailed question. While a personalized recommendation isn’t something we can offer, we can say that, in general, research suggests that most of the approaches you mentioned offer measurable but modest improvement rather than dramatic change, and outcomes depend heavily on individual skin type, history, and prior treatments. Given the specifics you’ve shared, a qualified provider would be the best resource to help weigh these options for your particular case.
Leave a comment
All comments are moderated before being published.
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.